By Douglas Walton

During a up to date stopover at to China to offer an invited lecture on criminal argumentation i used to be requested a question approximately traditional opinion in western international locations. If felony r- soning is assumed to be very important through these either in and out the felony prof- sion, why does there seem to be so little awareness given to the research of felony common sense? This used to be a difficult query to respond to. I needed to admit there have been no huge or well-established facilities of felony good judgment in North the US that i'll suggest as locations to review. facing customs in Vancouver, the customs officer requested what I have been doing in China. I advised him I were a speaker at a conf- ence. He requested what the convention used to be on. I informed him criminal common sense. He requested 1 even if there has been any such factor. He was once attempting to be humorous, yet i assumed he had an excellent aspect. humans will query no matter if there's this sort of factor as “legal logic”, and a few contemporary very well known trials provide the query a few backing within the universal opinion. yet having suggestion over the query of why so little recognition seems to be given to criminal common sense as a mainstream topic in western international locations, i believe I now have a solution. the answer's that we have got been having a look within the incorrect place.

Show description

Read Online or Download Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law PDF

Best logic books

Sets, logic & numbers

This article is designed to provide the scholar a history within the foundations of algebra and research. The algebra of symbolic good judgment and the idea that of set are brought early within the textual content in order that the most definitional improvement of the complicated quantity procedure flows simply from a collection of postulates for the usual numbers.

Fuzzy Logic Foundations and Industrial Applications

Fuzzy good judgment Foundations and business purposes is an geared up edited choice of contributed chapters masking simple fuzzy common sense conception, fuzzy linear programming, and functions. targeted emphasis has been given to assurance of contemporary learn effects, and to commercial functions of fuzzy good judgment.

Extra info for Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law

Sample text

Fig. 9. Araucaria Diagram for the Contract Case When the defendant argues that there is no contract because he was insane, the burden of persuasion shifts to his side because there is a global rule in law that the burden is on the claimant once the defense of insanity is brought forward. The relationship of the local to the global burden of proof is displayed in the following 7. Types of Dialogue 21 Araucaria diagram. This kind of diagrammatic representation can often be useful in analyzing the structure of a sequence of legal argumentation in a case (Branting, 2000).

It’s time to broaden what we take to be logic, and take a step that Wigmore would have approved of, by extending new methods that have proved their worth in analyzing everyday reasoning to cases of legal argumentation. 10. The Level of Difficulty of the Problems Araucaria is just one method of visualizing the structure of an argument, or sequence of reasoning. There are many other comparable methods, including Wigmore diagrams, diagrammatic tools for visualizing argumentation like Reasonable, and generally the use of graph structures like those developed by Pearl (1991) and Schum (1994).

Araucaria Diagram for the Contract Case When the defendant argues that there is no contract because he was insane, the burden of persuasion shifts to his side because there is a global rule in law that the burden is on the claimant once the defense of insanity is brought forward. The relationship of the local to the global burden of proof is displayed in the following 7. Types of Dialogue 21 Araucaria diagram. This kind of diagrammatic representation can often be useful in analyzing the structure of a sequence of legal argumentation in a case (Branting, 2000).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.38 of 5 – based on 28 votes