By Karen S. Feldman

In a piece that brings a brand new field-altering viewpoint in addition to new instruments to the heritage of philosophy, Karen S. Feldman deals a strong and assuredly written account of ways philosophical language seems to be to ''produce'' the very thing-here, ''conscience''-that it kind of feels to be learning or describing. sense of right and wrong, as Binding phrases convincingly argues, can purely ever be understood, interpreted, and made powerful via tropes and figures of language. The query this increases, and the person who pursuits Feldman this is: If sense of right and wrong has no tangible, literal referent to which we will practice, then the place does it get its ''binding force?'' Turning to Hobbes, Hegel, and Heidegger, Feldman analyzes the delicate rhetorical strikes during which those thinkers negotiate the sign up and house during which this sort of ''concept'' can take carry. The investigations of the figurative representations of judgment of right and wrong and its binding strength are taken because the start line in each one bankruptcy for a attention of ways Leviathan, Phenomenology of Spirit, and Being and Time are exemplary of sense of right and wrong, for those texts themselves dramatize conscience's relation to language and data, morality and accountability, and ontology. the concept that of binding strength is at stake during this publication on varied degrees: there's an research of the way, in the paintings of Hobbes, Hegel and Heidegger, judgment of right and wrong is defined as binding upon us: and extra. Feldman considers how the texts within which moral sense is defined could themselves be learn as binding.

Show description

Read or Download Binding Words: Conscience and Rhetoric in Hobbes, Hegel, and Heidegger PDF

Best phenomenology books

Binding Words: Conscience and Rhetoric in Hobbes, Hegel, and Heidegger

In a piece that brings a brand new field-altering standpoint in addition to new instruments to the historical past of philosophy, Karen S. Feldman deals a strong and assuredly written account of the way philosophical language seems to be to ''produce'' the very thing-here, ''conscience''-that it sort of feels to be getting to know or describing.

The Formation of Husserl’s Concept of Constitution

This paintings is conceived primarily as a old learn of the starting place and improvement of 1 of the main options in Husserl's philosophy. it's not essentially intended to be an advent to Husserl's proposal, yet can serve this function a result of nature of this idea. The doctrine of structure bargains with a philosophical challenge that's really effortless to understand, and but is primary adequate within the philosophy of Husserl to supply a con­ venient point of view from which different innovations and difficulties could be thought of and understood.

Material Ethics of Value: Max Scheler and Nicolai Hartmann

Max Scheler and Nicolai Hartmann built ethics upon a phenomenological foundation. This quantity demonstrates that their contributions to a fabric ethics of worth are complementary: through supplementing the paintings of 1 with that of the opposite, we receive a entire and defensible axiological and ethical concept.

The madness of vision : on baroque aesthetics

Christine Buci-Glucksmann’s The insanity of imaginative and prescient is without doubt one of the most influential stories in phenomenological aesthetics of the baroque. Integrating the paintings of Merleau-Ponty with Lacanian psychoanalysis, Renaissance reports in optics, and twentieth-century arithmetic, the author asserts the materiality of the physique and global in her aesthetic theory.

Additional info for Binding Words: Conscience and Rhetoric in Hobbes, Hegel, and Heidegger

Example text

While in comparison with religion and sovereignty conscience is not a topic of terribly heated debate in Hobbes research,5 nevertheless conscience in Leviathan, which Hobbes uses to illustrate the dangers of metaphor, is no incidental example with regard to Hobbes’s concerns. I will show in this chapter that although Hobbes’s discussion of conscience and metaphor is not a lengthy one, conscience may be seen to be the most dangerous metaphor for both Hobbes’s nominalism and his political philosophy as a whole, for it is precisely the metaphoric shift in our understanding of conscience that, in Hobbes’s account, corrupts knowledge into opinion, making error and deception possible.

I borrow 32 BINDING WORDS from Skinner’s important analysis in order to argue that it is in one respect too narrow: Hobbes’s account of conscience suggests that it is above all the concealment of the figurative character of figures that makes both metaphor and paradiastole worrisome for Hobbes. It is not just that one figure is more dangerous than another but rather that the concealments surrounding figures make each of them dangerous to the order of names and ultimately to the political stability of the commonwealth.

If the metaphoric extension of “conscience” from a knowing with others to a knowing interior to oneself were instead marked as metaphor, then the redefinition of conscience as private opinion would have to settle accounts with the original meaning. The extension of meaning, when concealed as such an extension, leaves meaning open to corruption. Metaphor bears no sign of the “as” or “like” that would point to original conditions, such as original meaning or the private will of a metaphor maker; metaphor conceals its provenance, its intention, and even the fact that it is metaphor.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.09 of 5 – based on 32 votes